<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Open Source on Nolpikir</title>
		<link>https://noether.codeberg.page/tags/open-source/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Open Source on Nolpikir</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 02:23:54 -0300</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://noether.codeberg.page/tags/open-source/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Github Is Malefic to OSS</title>
				<link>https://noether.codeberg.page/posts/github-is-malefic-to-oss/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 02:23:54 -0300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://noether.codeberg.page/posts/github-is-malefic-to-oss/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;belongs-to-microsoft&#34;&gt;Belongs to microsoft&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That is the reason one why you should never host a community based project in github, maybe only as mirror to make it more accessible to public, but certainly not as main git repository, specially when there are open source solutions like gitea.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h1 id=&#34;why-is-it-bad-to-belong-to-microsoft&#34;&gt;Why is it bad to belong to microsoft?&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Microsft has a huge historic of buying companies and projects, like github itself that was an independent platform, and then proceed to enshitficate it. Recently a cybersecurity researcher had a scandal with microsoft because he reported a secutiry flaw with windows and not only he got terminated his appeal was ignored, so he released to the public in github and after that he got not only his github account terminated, but also his gitlab account (pay attention because gitlab isnt detached from microsoft as we think so).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
